Ontario Universities Subject to Freedom Of Information Starting Today
Starting
today (June 10, 2006) the Ontario universities must comply with the Ontario Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). Like other public bodies subject to the scope of the Act universities must respond to FOI requests within set timelines. A decision by a university to refuse to release records in whole or part may be appealed to the Privacy Commissioner, not, as has been the case in the past, the university president who may have refused the request in the first instance. This is one small but welcome step towards bringing transparency and accountability to our publicly funded universities which have managed to avoid both so far. The public may now rely upon legislation to obtain information rather than the caprice of university presidents and administrators.
The details of the changes to the Act which take effect today are available in this document.
To make a Freedom of Information request to an Ontario University one need only complete a genericrequest form (found on the IPC website) together with a cheque for $5.00 and submit both to the responsible individual at the university. If you cannot find out who that person is the request may be addressed to "The Freedom of Information Officer" at the institution.
Universities are required by the Act to identify a person responsible for handing of FOI requests. However, very few appear to have done so, and few make that information readily available on their websites.
One exception seems to be University of Western Ontario. On June 8 UWO's communications office published a short article entitled New law guides privacy protection on campus briefly explaining that FIPPA applies to universities and what UWO was doing to prepare to comply. UWO's Freedom of Information & Privacy website contains additional information pertaining to the change.
With the extension of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) to Ontario universities in June 2006, records under Western's custody or control are now subject to this provincial legislation.
The approach at Trent University stands in stark contrast that of UWO. (Oddly, Trent president Bonnie Patterson graduated from UWO in 1979).
It takes some digging around their website but you can find Trent's Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information Policy and the contact information for the Privacy Officer (a telling juxtaposition of terms?)
Susan Bartsch, Privacy Officer
University Secretariat
1st floor, Bata Library
748-1011 extension 1499
sbartsch@trentu.ca
The Government of Ontario Access and Privacy Office website publishes a Directory of Institutions with the name, office and contact information for each head (eg: FOI officer). Not one university appears in the directory even though the Act now applies to all Ontario universities!
One would have hoped the universities would have been more communicative and pro-active, expecially given it was announced more that a year ago that they would be subject to the Act, but alas that appears not to be the case.
Vigilance will be required as we expect universities will attempt to develop strategies to circumvent FIPPA. Obfuscation might be one strategy. Another strategy at play appears to be the use of corporate entities as a shield for FOI requests. For example, York University is claiming that records held by the York University Development Corporation (YUDC) are not subject to the ACT.
YUDC exists to "establish a mechanism for profitable and desirable property development within the multi-faceted university environment.", and its mission statement is "To provide the very best in Real Estate Advisory, Development, and Management Expertise." The property in question is owned by taxpayer funded York University.
York University President Lorna Marsden, Vice-President Finance and Administration Gary Brewer, University Secretary & General Counsel Harriet Lewis, Chair Marshall A. Cohen, Vice-Chair Timothy Price, Board Member Peter Currie, Honourary Members William Dimma and Joseph Sorbara and former Board Member Phillip Lapp occupy 9 of the 11 seats on the YUDC board.
It remains to be seen if the assertion by York Board members that the YUDC is not subject to FIPPA with withstand the test of the Act. FOI requests with respect to the YUDC are being prepared.
Trent University is actively working on its own plans to create a separate corporation similar to the YUDC.
Recommendations to form the Trent University Development Corporation to manage its endowment lands were contained in Part 4 of the Endowment Lands Master Plan. Patterson and the Trent administration made a big deal in the press of how inclusive and participatory the process was that created this Master Plan, when in fact the record appears to confirm the plan was signed, sealed, and delivered according to the direction of the administration with only lip-service paid to the input of staff, faculty, students and the public.
Most of the public feedback is deeply against the concept of Trent University Development Corporation, in part because many see it as a strategy to avoid FIPPA with respect to the development of Trent's lands (which many see that Trent holds in the public trust). The Board has paid little heed, save for its concerns over optics, and continued to actively pursue the creation of Trent University Development Corporation.
Publicly funded universities should not be allowed to create corporate or other entities that attempt to remove aspects of its business from public scrutiny and/or FIPPA. The only exemptions to disclosure should be those narrowly defined in legislation.
References:
- New law guides privacy protection on campus
University of Western Ontario News - June 8, 2006 - FOI jurisdiction questioned
Administration claims are disputed by professor
Excalibur - May 31, 2006 - Trent University Development Corporation Plan Still Alive
February 20, 2006 - Of Poor Governance, Suburban Isolation And Snake Oil (re: Trent University Development Corporation)
January 18, 2006
- Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA - a.k.a. FOIPPA)
with amendments effective June 10, 2006 - Government of Ontario Access and Privacy Office
- Directory of Institutions (FOI contact information)
- Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner
- Trent University Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information Policy
| New law guides privacy protection on campus University of Western Ontario News - June 8, 2006 By Paul Mayne Come Monday morning, the general public will have gained greater access to information at Western. The provincial Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) kicks in June 10 and for the first time legislation will broadly guide how information is protected or made available on request. Faculty and staff members will need to become aware of what the Act entails and be prepared to handle requests for information, says university Archivist Robin Keirstead, of Western's Freedom of Information and Privacy (FOIP) Advisory Committee. In an institution that collects a great deal of personal information, at the same time it is publicly accountable for taxpayer support, every employee has a role in understanding and carrying out the intent of the law. "It's not a case of we have to stop doing things, but rather just do them differently," he says. "There'll be no fundamental difference in our approach, but certain practices will need change and there'll be inconveniences in some ways for faculty and staff, as well as perhaps students and the general public." If staff and faculty have been giving out information in the past they should continue to do so, but when it comes to personal information they need to think twice. "When in doubt, ask before you jump," he says. An example of how the law could affect Western includes the posting of student marks. While marks have long been posted publicly with student numbers, this may no longer be acceptable. Another aspect of the law suggests professors may need to begin archiving certain types of student communication. This is the first time Ontario universities as a whole have been subject to legislative requirements. The intent of the law is to continue - and if possible enhance - free flow of information through informal channels. Keirstead says when FIPPA was first introduced in the late 1980s, post-secondary educational institutions were intended to be part of the legislation. Why they are being amalgamated now is a combination of factors, he says. "It's a sign of the times, part of the government's desire for broader accountability, and perhaps a perception that some institutions have not been as forthcoming as others with information," he says. A formal request for information to the university must be submitted in writing, make reference to FIPPA or a legal right of access, provide sufficient detail to enable staff to identify relevant records and include the prescribed $5 request fee. Universities in several other provinces - including British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec and Nova Scotia - have been subject to similar legislation for a number of years. "It's not that black and white," says Keirstead. "It's about a balancing act of the public's right to information and the university's right to confidentiality. " He adds the translation of the Act from provincial government ministries to post-secondary institutions will need a transition period, noting it will be "an ongoing learning experience" for the university. Western has established a Freedom of Information and Privacy (FOIP) Advisory Committee that is responsible for implementation planning and addressing ongoing requirements associated with compliance. Faculties and major administrative units have appointed liaison officers who are working with FOIP to deal with the new legislation. |
| FOI jurisdiction questioned Administration claims are disputed by professor Excalibur - May 31, 2006 By Sarah Millar, Assistant News Editor Is the York University Development Corporation (YUDC) exempt from the new Freedom of Information laws that come into effect on June 10? "Harriet Lewis, at the last Board of Governor's meeting, mistakenly assured the BOG that the YUDC would not come under the FOI Act," Noble said. Under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, universities across Ontario are expected to keep all administrative documents available for public viewing. "The amendments to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act bring ?educational institutions' under the legislation. The YUDC is a separate, incorporated institution from York, she added. "While the university is a shareholder of that corporation, the YUDC entity itself is not an educational institution, and thus as an entity, it is not subject to FOI." Noble thinks YUDC is not exempt from the new FOI laws, which will include universities (the previous Act did not), due to a court case he currently has pending in British Columbia against Simon Fraser Univentures, which is a company similar to YUDC at Simon Fraser University. "I went to the privacy commissioner and the commissioner realised this was a big deal," Noble said, adding that other universities in B.C. are waiting for the decision from the commissioner as well. Noble is confident his court case in B.C. will show that he is in the right, and said that the decision will set a precedent for all university development corporations. He can also foresee the same thing happening in Ontario. "A request is going to be made for YUDC and it will be denied; it will be appealed. We'll go to an adjudicator and then we'll be in the same situation as B.C.," he said. "I think we'll prevail. It took four years to get the universities under the Act, but we prevailed." Noble plans to file FOI requests on the YUDC, although he wouldn't detail what his specific requests would be to Excalibur. Noble will also be setting up a new committee to assist people wishing to file FOI requests against the university. York Public Access will inform people on the process of an FOI request and help them throughout it. He said York Public Access will be setting up FOI workshops in the fall. |
